VALUES AND INFORMATION SOURCE PREFERENCES = LES VALEURS ET LES PREFERENCES DE SOURCE D'INFORMATIONSTARCK K.1973; J. COMMUNIC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 23; NO 1; PP. 74-85; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

ZUR GLAUBWUERDIGKEIT VON ZEUGENAUSSAGEN: EXPERIMENTELLE UEBERPRUEFUNG AUSGEWAEHLTER GLAUBWUERDIGKEITSKRITERIEN = CREDIBILITE DES TEMOIGNAGES: EXPERIMENTATION DES CRITERES SELECTIONNES DE CREDIBILITEKOHNKEN G; WEGENER H.1982; Z. EXP. ANGEW. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0044-2712; DEU; DA. 1982; VOL. 29; NO 1; PP. 92-111; ABS. ENG/FRE; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

PREFERENCES OF INDUSTRIAL MANAGERS FOR INFORMATION SOURCES IN MAKING PROMOTION DECISIONSTAYLOR RN.1975; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 60; NO 2; PP. 269-272; BIBL. 13REFArticle

KLASSIFIKATION UND BEWERTUNG VON INFORMATION = CLASSIFICATION ET EVALUATION DE L'INFORMATIONHAISCH J; GRABITZ HJ.1974; ARCH. PSYCHOL.; DTSCH.; DA. 1974; VOL. 126; NO 1; PP. 57-70; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 12REF.Article

CREDIBILITY OF SOURCES OF INFORMATION ABOUT DRUGS TO HEROIN ADDICTS.SINNETT ER; HAGEN K; HARVEY WM et al.1976; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 37; NO 3 PART. 2; PP. 1239-1242; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

DOGMATISM, TRUST, AND MESSAGE ACCEPTANCE.ROTTON J; BLAKE BF; HESLIN R et al.1977; J. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 96; NO 1; PP. 81-88; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

INFORMATION SEEKING WITH INPUT PACING AND MULTIPLE DECISION OPPORTUNITIESLEVINE JM; SAMET MG; BRAHLEK RE et al.1974; HUM. FACTORS; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 16; NO 4; PP. 384-394; BIBL. 8REF.Article

PARAPSYCHOLOGY AND GENESIS OF DOUBT.ROGO DS.1977; PARAPSYCHOL. REV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 8; NO 6; PP. 20-22; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF COMMUNICATION APPREHENSION ON COMMUNICATION EFFECTIVENESS.FREIMUTH VS.1976; HUM. COMMUNIC. RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 2; NO 3; PP. 289-298; BIBL. 1 P.Article

DETECTION OF TRUTHFUL AND DECEPTIVE INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS ACROSS INFORMATION TRANSMISSION MODESLITTLEPAGE GE; PINEAULT MA.1981; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-4545; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 114; NO 1; PP. 57-68; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

LEADING QUESTIONS AND THE EYEWITNESS REPORT OF A LIVE AND A DESCRIBED INCIDENT.BROWN L; HEYMANN S; PRESKILL B et al.1977; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 40; NO 3 PART. 2; PP. 1041-1042; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

REPRESSION SENSITIZATION AND PROCESSING OF FAVORABLE AND ADVERSE INFORMATION.SHAVIT H; SHOUVAL R.1977; J. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 33; NO 4; PP. 1041-1044; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

DER EINFLUSS DER RELIABILITAET DER INFORMATION UND DER SPEZIFIKATION DER LOESUNGSALTERNATIVEN AUF DIE BEARBEITUNG VON DIAGNOSEPROBLEMEN = L'INFLUENCE DE LA CREDIBILITE DE L'INFORMATION ET PRECISIONS DES ALTERNATIVES DE SOLUTION SUR L'ADAPTATION DES PROBLEMES DIAGNOSTIQUESHAISCH J; GRABITZ HJ.1979; ARCH. PSYCHOL.; DEU; DA. 1979; VOL. 132; NO 1; PP. 41-48; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

ENQUETE SUR LA CREDIBILITE ET LA COHERENCE DES REPONSES DONNEES PAR LES ALCOOLIQUES AUX QUESTIONS PORTANT SUR LA CONSOMMATION D'ALCOOLBABOR TF; WEILL J; FERRANT JP et al.1981; REV. ALCOOL.; ISSN 0035-130X; FRA; DA. 1981; VOL. 27; NO 2; PP. 85-96; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

CREDIBILITY OF COMMUNICATORS AND DISTRACTION AS PREDICTORS OF CHANGE IN ATTITUDEBURGOON M; FRAEDRICH L; BACHMAN S et al.1979; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 45; NO 2; PP. 479-482; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

DIARY GIVES MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION ABOUT ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION THAN QUESTIONNAIREPOIKOLAINEN K; KAERKKAEINEN P.1983; DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE; ISSN 0376-8716; CHE; DA. 1983; VOL. 11; NO 2; PP. 209-216; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF THREE INTERVIEW FACTORS ON THE VALIDITY OF ALCOHOL ABUSERS' SELF-REPORTSSOBELL LC; SOBELL MB.1981; AM. J. DRUG ALCOHOL ABUSE; ISSN 0095-2990; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 8; NO 2; PP. 225-237; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

PERSEVERANCE OF SOCIAL THEORIES: THE ROLE OF EXPLANATION IN THE PERSISTENCE OF DISCREDITED INFORMATIONANDERSON CA; LEPPER MR; ROSS L et al.1980; J. PERS. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3514; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 39; NO 6; PP. 1037-1049; BIBL. DISSEM.Article

TEACHERS' SENSITIVITY TO THE RELIABILITY OF INFORMATION IN MAKING CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONS IN AN ACHIEVEMENT SITUATION.BORKO H; SHAVELSON RJ.1978; J. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 70; NO 3; PP. 271-279; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

DOES INSECURITY BREED ACCEPTANCE.: EFFECTS OF TRAIT AND SITUATIONAL INSECURITY ON ACCEPTANCE OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE DIAGNOSTIC FEEDBACK.SNYDER CR; CLAIR MS.1977; J. CONSULTG CLIN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 45; NO 5; PP. 843-850; BIBL. 36 REF.Article

THERAPEUGENIC FACTORS IN PSYCHOTHERAPY: THE EFFECTS OF FEE AND TITLE ON CREDIBILITY AND ATTRACTIONTRAUTT GM; BLOOM LJ.1982; J. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0021-9762; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 38; NO 2; PP. 274-279; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

OVERCONFIDENCE IN IGNORANT EXPERTSBRADLEY JV.1981; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 17; NO 2; PP. 82-84; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

Influence of subject and interviewer characteristics on the reliability of young adults' self-reports of drinkingCONNORS, G. J; WATSON, D. W; MAISTO, S. A et al.Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment. 1985, Vol 7, Num 4, pp 365-374, issn 0882-2689Article

Eyewitness identification: retrospective self-awareness and the accuracy-confidence correlationKASSIN, S. M.Journal of personality and social psychology. 1985, Vol 49, Num 4, pp 878-893, issn 0022-3514Article

Hypnotic memory enhancement of witnesses: does it work?SMITH, M. C.Psychological bulletin. 1983, Vol 94, Num 3, pp 387-407, issn 0033-2909Article